In re Fowler
2 Barb. Ch. 305
Opinion
said the court had no jurisdiction to issue a commission, unless the alleged lunatic resided here, or was the owner of property in this state. And that in case of his non-residence, the fact of his owning property here must be stated in the petition. It was not sufficient to set it forth in the affidavits.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Fowler, 2 Barb. Ch. 305 (N.Y. 1847).
2 Barb. Ch. 305 (In re Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Guardianship of Sall
110 P. 32 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
In re Devausney
52 N.J. Eq. 502 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1894)