In re Foteos S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Foteos S.

216 A.D.2d 955, 629 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7356

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1995·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The determination of Family Court to extend respondent’s placement for an additional 12 months is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Percy H., 159 AD2d 623). There is no merit to respondent’s procedural argument. The County Attorney, the appropriate presentment agency (see, Family Ct Act § 301.2 [12]; §§ 254, 254-a), was notified of the hearing and was provided with an opportunity to be heard (see, Family Ct Act § 355.3 [2]). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J.—Extend Placement.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The determination of Family Court to extend respondent’s placement for an additional 12 months is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Matter of Percy H., 159 AD2d 623). There is no merit to respondent’s procedural argument. The County Attorney, the appropriate presentment agency (see, Family Ct Act § 301.2 [12]; §§ 254, 254-a), was notified of the hearing and was provided with an opportunity to be heard (see, Family Ct Act § 355.3 [2]). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J.—Extend Placement.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

In re Foteos S., 216 A.D.2d 955, 629 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 955 (In re Foteos S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related