In re Foster
This text of 135 A.3d 94 (In re Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Oregon for a period of thirty days, this court’s December 23, 2015, order , suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why she should not be suspended for a period of thirty days as reciprocal discipline, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, the statement of respondent that [95]*95she does not oppose the imposition of reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on January 25, 2016, it is
ORDERED that Rosemary Foster is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of thirty days, nunc pro tunc to January 25, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.3d 94, 2016 WL 1394441, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-foster-dc-2016.