In re Fortson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Fortson

609 S.E.2d 286, 362 S.C. 455, 2005 S.C. LEXIS 26

DecidedJanuary 31, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 609 S.E.2d 286 (In re Fortson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fortson, 609 S.E.2d 286, 362 S.C. 455, 2005 S.C. LEXIS 26 (S.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[456]*456ORDER

Respondent was suspended on November 22, 2004, for a period of sixty (60) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice.

BY /s/ Daniel E. Shearsouse Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[456]*456ORDER

Respondent was suspended on November 22, 2004, for a period of sixty (60) days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice.

BY /s/ Daniel E. Shearsouse Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

609 S.E.2d 286, 362 S.C. 455, 2005 S.C. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fortson-sc-2005.