In re Fornaro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fornaro

732 A.2d 514, 159 N.J. 525, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 849

DecidedJuly 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 732 A.2d 514 (In re Fornaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fornaro, 732 A.2d 514, 159 N.J. 525, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 849 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 23, 1998, having filed a report with the Court concluding that MARIA P. FORNARO of MORRISTOWN, and who was suspended from practice for a period of three months effective March 24, 1998, and who remains suspended at this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failing to give client an accounting of services rendered), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARIA P. FORNARO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 23, 1998, having filed a report with the Court concluding that MARIA P. FORNARO of MORRISTOWN, and who was suspended from practice for a period of three months effective March 24, 1998, and who remains suspended at this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failing to give client an accounting of services rendered), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARIA P. FORNARO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 A.2d 514, 159 N.J. 525, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fornaro-nj-1999.