In re Forkin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Forkin

802 A.2d 511, 173 N.J. 390, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1104

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 24, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that THOMAS JOHN FORKIN of ATLANTIC CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, and who has been suspended from practice since May 29, 2001, pursuant to Orders of this Court filed April 27, 2001, and June 25, 2001, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney [391] Ethics proctor for a period of two years, and until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that THOMAS JOHN FORKIN of ATLANTIC CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, and who has been suspended from practice since May 29, 2001, pursuant to Orders of this Court filed April 27, 2001, and June 25, 2001, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney [391] Ethics proctor for a period of two years, and until the further Order of the Court.

In re Forkin, 802 A.2d 511, 173 N.J. 390, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1104 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

802 A.2d 511 (In re Forkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.