In re Forgey

785 N.E.2d 1098, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 291, 2003 WL 1792273
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedApril 3, 2003
DocketNo. 18S00-0111-DI-555
StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 1098 (In re Forgey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Forgey, 785 N.E.2d 1098, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 291, 2003 WL 1792273 (Ind. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER CONVERTING SUSPENSION FOR NONCOOPERATION WITH THE DISCIPLINARY PROCESS TO INDEFINITE SUSPENSION

On February 18, 2002, pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10), this Court suspended the respondent, J. Seott Forgey, from the practice of law in this state for failing to provide to the Disciplinary Commission responses to grievances filed against him. This Court continued that suspension by order issued September 4, 2002. The Disciplinary Commission has now moved to have the respondent's suspension converted to an indefinite suspension from the practice of law, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(10).

We now find that more than six months have passed since the respondent was suspended due to his noneooperation with the disciplinary process. Accordingly, given the passage of time and the respondent's continued failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process, we now find that the respondent's suspension should be converted to an indefinite suspension from the practice of law, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 283(10).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the current suspension from the practice of law of the respondent, J. Scott Forgey, for failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process is hereby converted to an indefinite suspension, effective immediately. Accordingly, in order to become readmitted to the practice of law in this state, the respondent must successfully petition this Court for readmittance pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc. R. 23(4).

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent or his attorney and to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 N.E.2d 1098, 2003 Ind. LEXIS 291, 2003 WL 1792273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-forgey-ind-2003.