In re Forfeiture of One 1987 Mazda

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Forfeiture of One 1987 Mazda

546 So. 2d 465, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1769, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4199, 1989 WL 81757

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1082

StatusPublished

This text of 546 So. 2d 465 (In re Forfeiture of One 1987 Mazda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Forfeiture of One 1987 Mazda, 546 So. 2d 465, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1769, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4199, 1989 WL 81757 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We hold that there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion as to the ownership of the vehicle in question and as to whether the owner breached its responsibility as to knowledge of the vehicle’s use. Based on the evidence presented, those were factual issues to be resolved by the trial court.

ANSTEAD, STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We hold that there is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion as to the ownership of the vehicle in question and as to whether the owner breached its responsibility as to knowledge of the vehicle’s use. Based on the evidence presented, those were factual issues to be resolved by the trial court.

ANSTEAD, STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 So. 2d 465, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1769, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4199, 1989 WL 81757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-forfeiture-of-one-1987-mazda-fladistctapp-1989.