In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford V.I.N. 9G87F167035

450 So. 2d 863, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12774
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1984·No. No. 83-1372·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a forfeiture case where the only connection shown between the vehicle forfeited and the appellant’s illegal activities was that the vehicle was used by the appellant to travel to and from a bar where appellant consummated an illegal drug transaction. We agree with the trial court that these facts constitute a sufficient showing of the use of the vehicle to facilitate or aid and abet in the commission of the illegal transaction to authorize forfeiture. See Chapter 932, Florida Statutes (1983) and In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla, 424 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford V.I.N. 9G87F167035, 450 So. 2d 863, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

450 So. 2d 863 (In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford V.I.N. 9G87F167035) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Caggiano
496 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Duckham v. State
478 So. 2d 347 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. One (1) 1977 Volkswagen, VIN/1773229365, Florida License "KTV-062"
455 So. 2d 434 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)