In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens

21 A.D.3d 555, 799 N.Y.S.2d 904
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 A.D.3d 1243

Opinion

[556]*556In a proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 11 to foreclose tax liens, Adam Quinn appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated March 4, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated November 5, 2002.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the City of Newburgh’s mailing of notice of tax foreclosure proceedings by certified mail, return receipt requested to the appellant, instead of by “certified mail,” as required by Real Property Tax Law § 1125 (1) (a), did not render the foreclosure proceedings defective. Moreover, the City satisfied due process by affording the appellant notice that was reasonably calculated to apprise him of the existence of the foreclosure action (see Kennedy v Mossafa, 100 NY2d 1, 9 [2003]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens, 21 A.D.3d 555, 799 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 555 (In re Foreclosure of Tax Liens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kennedy v. Mossafa
789 N.E.2d 607 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)