In re Foreclosure by Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Foreclosure by Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC

794 S.E.2d 484, 369 N.C. 221, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 1162

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 21, 2016·No. No. 276PA15·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trustee effectively withdrew its notice of non-judicial foreclosure hearing, thus terminating the proceeding, there was no pending case on which the clerk of court could act. See In re Foreclosure of Lucks, _ N.C. _, _,_ S.E.2d _, _(Dec. 21, 2016) (No. 162A16). As a result, we h ereby vacate the clerk of court’s order and that of the superior court, as well as the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the trustee effectively withdrew its notice of non-judicial foreclosure hearing, thus terminating the proceeding, there was no pending case on which the clerk of court could act. See In re Foreclosure of Lucks, _ N.C. _, _,_ S.E.2d _, _(Dec. 21, 2016) (No. 162A16). As a result, we h ereby vacate the clerk of court’s order and that of the superior court, as well as the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

VACATED.

In re Foreclosure by Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC, 794 S.E.2d 484, 369 N.C. 221, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 1162 (N.C. 2016).

Pincite

794 S.E.2d 484 (In re Foreclosure by Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.