In re Ford

26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3072
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Ford. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 A.D.2d 806

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. The awards rest solely on proof of reproduction cost less depreciation, without any indication that either property was unique or a specialty (Guthmuller v. State of New York, 23 A D 2d 597). Determinations thus bottomed on erroneous principles of law must, of course, be rejected (Matter of Huie [Fletcher], 2 N Y 2d 168, 171). Orders reversed, on the law and the facts, and cases remanded to Special Term for remittal to a new commission for rehearing and determination, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ford, 26 A.D.2d 980, 274 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 980 (In re Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.