Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Ford

In re Ford

355 N.E.2d 295, 39 N.Y.2d 1000, 387 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2937
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 355 N.E.2d 295 (In re Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ford, 355 N.E.2d 295, 39 N.Y.2d 1000, 387 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2937 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that claimants’ privilege under the 1927 deed "to bathe in Flagler Lake” was a mere license, not an easement (see, also, 3 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, License, .§ 1.03). Thus, the claim is for indirect damage to real estate "not taken” (Administrative Code of City of New York, § K5144.0) and interest runs only from the date the award was confirmed, not the date of the taking (Hudson Riv. Tel. Co. v City of New York, 210 NY 394, 397-398).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg. Taking no part: Judge Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scheer v. Kahn
221 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Wachs v. Winter
569 F. Supp. 1438 (E.D. New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 N.E.2d 295, 39 N.Y.2d 1000, 387 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ford-ny-1976.