In re for Discipline of Boozier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re for Discipline of Boozier

82 N.W.2d 841, 248 Minn. 579, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 653

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 18, 1956

DocketNo. 36,833

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 N.W.2d 841 (In re for Discipline of Boozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re for Discipline of Boozier, 82 N.W.2d 841, 248 Minn. 579, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 653 (Mich. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Suspension from Practice of Law

Upon the petition of the Practice of Law Committee of the State Bar Association for an order suspending Manley F. Boozier as an attorney at law, or otherwise disciplining him in accordance with Supreme Court Eule XXI (222 Minn, xxxix), and

Whereas the verified petition and accusation on file with this court charge that said Boozier has been guilty of serious acts of professional misconduct which, if true, disqualify him as an attorney at law, and

Whereas this court on December 15, 1955, issued an order providing that a copy of such order, together with a copy of said petition and accusation, be forthwith served upon the said Manley F. Boozier wherever he may be found, within or without the State of Minnesota, in a manner provided for in Eule XXI, and further providing that the said Manley F. Boozier plead or file his answer in duplicate to the said petition and accusation in the office of the clerk of this court in the State Capitol in the city of St. Paul, Minnesota, and serve a copy thereof upon the attorney for the petitioner at his office in the city of St. Paul within eight days after the service of such order, petition, and accusation, and

Whereas it appears by the affidavit of petitioner’s attorney, and by the return of the sheriff of Eamsey County, Minnesota (being the county wherein Boozier last resided and practiced law), that the said Manley F. Boozier, after due and diligent search, cannot be found, and whereas said affidavit and return are on file herein,

It Is Hereby Ordered, Pursuant to Eule XXI, that said Manley F. Boozier be suspended as an attorney and officer of this and of all other Minnesota courts, and that said suspension shall remain in effect until the further order of this court, and

[580]*580Dated July 18, 1956.

It Is Further Ordered, That a copy of this order be mailed to every district judge in the State of Minnesota.

BY THE COURT

William P. Murphy Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Suspension from Practice of Law

Upon the petition of the Practice of Law Committee of the State Bar Association for an order suspending Manley F. Boozier as an attorney at law, or otherwise disciplining him in accordance with Supreme Court Eule XXI (222 Minn, xxxix), and

Whereas the verified petition and accusation on file with this court charge that said Boozier has been guilty of serious acts of professional misconduct which, if true, disqualify him as an attorney at law, and

Whereas this court on December 15, 1955, issued an order providing that a copy of such order, together with a copy of said petition and accusation, be forthwith served upon the said Manley F. Boozier wherever he may be found, within or without the State of Minnesota, in a manner provided for in Eule XXI, and further providing that the said Manley F. Boozier plead or file his answer in duplicate to the said petition and accusation in the office of the clerk of this court in the State Capitol in the city of St. Paul, Minnesota, and serve a copy thereof upon the attorney for the petitioner at his office in the city of St. Paul within eight days after the service of such order, petition, and accusation, and

Whereas it appears by the affidavit of petitioner’s attorney, and by the return of the sheriff of Eamsey County, Minnesota (being the county wherein Boozier last resided and practiced law), that the said Manley F. Boozier, after due and diligent search, cannot be found, and whereas said affidavit and return are on file herein,

It Is Hereby Ordered, Pursuant to Eule XXI, that said Manley F. Boozier be suspended as an attorney and officer of this and of all other Minnesota courts, and that said suspension shall remain in effect until the further order of this court, and

[580]*580Dated July 18, 1956.

It Is Further Ordered, That a copy of this order be mailed to every district judge in the State of Minnesota.

BY THE COURT

William P. Murphy Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 N.W.2d 841, 248 Minn. 579, 1956 Minn. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-for-discipline-of-boozier-minn-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack