In re Fogle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Fogle

303 S.E.2d 90, 279 S.C. 131, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 343

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 5, 1983·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Solicitor Norman E. Fogle sought retirement pursuant to South Carolina Code § 9-8-10, et seq. (1976). Based upon medical reports submitted thereunder, this Court by Order dated April 7, 1983, found him totally and permanently disabled from rendering useful and efficient service in his position as Solicitor.

Under the facts presented, that conclusion dictates that this Court indefinitely suspend Norman E. Fogle from the practice of law. He shall forthwith deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, within five days, his certificate admitting him to practice law in this State.

And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Solicitor Norman E. Fogle sought retirement pursuant to South Carolina Code § 9-8-10, et seq. (1976). Based upon medical reports submitted thereunder, this Court by Order dated April 7, 1983, found him totally and permanently disabled from rendering useful and efficient service in his position as Solicitor.

Under the facts presented, that conclusion dictates that this Court indefinitely suspend Norman E. Fogle from the practice of law. He shall forthwith deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, within five days, his certificate admitting him to practice law in this State.

And it is so ordered.

In re Fogle, 303 S.E.2d 90, 279 S.C. 131, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 343 (S.C. 1983).

Pincite

303 S.E.2d 90 (In re Fogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related