In re Fogerty

847 A.2d 671, 577 Pa. 556, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 982
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 8, 2004
DocketNo. 900 DISC 3, C2-03-915, 61456
StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 671 (In re Fogerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fogerty, 847 A.2d 671, 577 Pa. 556, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 982 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on February 18, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing James Martin Fogerty to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; James Martin Fogerty is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 A.2d 671, 577 Pa. 556, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fogerty-pa-2004.