In re F.M.G.
926 N.W.2d 709
Opinion
[¶1] F.M.G. appeals from the district court's continuing treatment order. F.M.G. argues there is not clear and convincing evidence she is mentally ill and a person requiring continued treatment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re F.M.G., 926 N.W.2d 709 (N.D. 2019).
926 N.W.2d 709 (In re F.M.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.