In Re Flynn's Construction, Inc.

166 B.R. 1, 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 2087, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 589, 1994 WL 150347
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
DecidedApril 1, 1994
Docket14-10173
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 B.R. 1 (In Re Flynn's Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Flynn's Construction, Inc., 166 B.R. 1, 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 2087, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 589, 1994 WL 150347 (Me. 1994).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JAMES A. GOODMAN, Chief Judge.

Creditor Peoples Heritage Savings Bank (“Peoples”) submitted an application for allowance and payment of an administrative expense (the “Application”). After due deliberation, this Court holds that Peoples’ administrative claim is entitled to superpriority only over Chapter 11 administrative expenses.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 21, 1993, the Debtor, Flynn’s Construction, Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and on August 27,1993, the proceeding was converted to Chapter 7. Peoples is a secured lender of the Debtor, with its loan secured by five pieces of heavy construction equipment (the “Collateral”). Pursuant to a stipulation entered into between the Debtor and Peoples while the Debtor was a debtor-in-possession, the Debtor was permitted to use the Collateral in exchange for providing weekly adequate protection payments to Peoples to protect Peoples’ interest in the depreciating Collateral. The Debtor made seven weekly payments to the Bank under the stipulation before payments ceased. 1 After payments ceased, and while the Automatic Stay was still in place, the Debtor continued to use the Collateral to generate revenue for the estate.

After the proceeding was converted to Chapter 7, Peoples began attempts to sell the *2 Collateral, and Peoples now anticipates a deficiency from the sale. 2 As a result, Peoples filed the instant Application and sought to recoup out of the assets of the Chapter 7 estate a portion of the deficiency as an administrative expense. After negotiations with the Chapter 7 Trustee, it was agreed that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 507(b) Peoples would be given a superpriority administrative claim in the amount of $7,500 (Peoples’ estimate of the amount that the Collateral decreased in value during the Chapter 11 ease), and that this claim would have priority over all other administrative claims allowable under Section 507(a)(1), including all Chapter 11 administrative expenses and some Chapter 7 administrative expenses. 3 The revised Application was submitted to the Court for approval.

II. ANALYSIS

Section 507(b) provides “that when adequate protection has been given to a secured creditor and later proves to be inadequate, the creditor becomes entitled to a superpriority administrative claim to the extent that the proffered adequate protection was insufficient.” 4 In re Carpet Center Leasing Co., Inc., 991 F.2d 682, 685 (11th Cir.1993); Grundy Nat’l Bank v. Rife, 876 F.2d 361, 363 (4th Cir.1989). Peoples maintains that this Code section enables its $7,500 “inadequate” protection claim to gain superp-riority over not only all Chapter 11 administrative expenses but over Chapter 7 administrative expenses as well (excluding those which the Chapter 7 Trustee bargained for in the revised Application).

This Court disagrees with Peoples. Peoples $7,500 claim arose during the Chapter 11 portion of this proceeding. This fact is important, because Section 726(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that administrative claims incurred under Section 503(b) following the conversion of a reorganization case are entitled to superpriority over like claims incurred prior to conversion. 5 11 U.S.C. § 726(b). The failure of adequate protection in a reorganization case is an administrative expense of that case and is therefore subject to the payment of any and all administrative expenses which may arise during a superseding liquidation. Claims in *3 tended to compensate failed adequate protection have priority only over those administrative expenses incurred prior to conversion. See In re Sun Runner Marine, Inc., 134 B.R. 4, 7 (9th Cir. BAP 1991).

The priority status for Chapter 7 administrative expenses was intended to “encourage capable trustees and other professionals to take part in liquidation to maximize the benefit for those who seek satisfaction of their claims against the estate.” Id. See e.g. In re Roundwood Corp., Inc., 72 B.R. 296, 299 (Bankr.D.S.C.1987); In re J.R. Research, Inc., 66 B.R. 747, 751 (Bankr.D.Ut.1986); In re Codesco, Inc., 18 B.R. 225, 227 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1982). Providing ultimate priority to claims arising under Section 726(b), ensures that a liquidation will be carried out consistent with the expressed will of Congress: “[t]hose who must wind up the affairs of a debtor’s estate must be assured of payment, or else they will not participate in the liquidation or distribution of the estate.” H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 186-187, 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 5787. Therefore, Peoples has a $7,500 superpriority administrative expense claim only over administrative expenses incurred during the Chapter 11 phase of this proceeding, not over Chapter 7 administrative expenses.

ORDER

Pursuant to a Memorandum of Decision of even date herewith, it is hereby

ORDERED that the application for allowance and payment of an administrative expense submitted by Peoples Heritage Savings Bank is hereby allowed for the amount of $7,500.00, said amount having priority status only over other Chapter 11 administrative expenses of the Debtor.

1

. Paragraph 4 of the stipulation provided that “the Bank shall have claims under Section 507(b) of the Code in the event that, notwithstanding such protection, the Bank has a claim allowable under Section 507(a)(1) of the Code.”

2

. Peoples obtained relief from the Automatic Stay to pursue its state law rights and remedies against the Collateral.

3

. Peoples’ original Application sought superpri-ority status for the $7,500 claim ahead of all Chapter 11 and all Chapter 7 administrative expenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Lochmiller Industries, Inc.
178 B.R. 241 (S.D. California, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 B.R. 1, 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 2087, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 589, 1994 WL 150347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-flynns-construction-inc-meb-1994.