in Re Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 30, 2013·No. 01-13-00637-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 30, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00637-CV ——————————— IN RE FLOYD STEELE COOLEY AND MARION COOLEY, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley have filed a petition for

writ of mandamus in this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon

2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Relators request this Court to order the trial

court to vacate its “order compelling arbitration” and its “order staying discovery.” *

We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.

* The underlying case is Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. GL Clear Lake, LLC; GL Clear Lake II, LLC; Garcadia Holdings, LLC; and Garff Enterprises, Inc., cause number 2013–10558, pending in the 151st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mike Engelhart, presiding. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley (in Re Floyd Steele Cooley and Marion Cooley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.