In re Floyd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Floyd

505 S.E.2d 593, 332 S.C. 489, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 129

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided September 11, 1998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent has been arrested and charged with entering a bank with intent to steal, assault and battery, armed robbery, and seven counts of kidnapping. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition for interim suspension seeking to have respondent temporarily suspended from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Rule 17(a) and (b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent has been arrested and charged with entering a bank with intent to steal, assault and battery, armed robbery, and seven counts of kidnapping. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition for interim suspension seeking to have respondent temporarily suspended from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Rule 17(a) and (b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

In re Floyd, 505 S.E.2d 593, 332 S.C. 489, 1998 S.C. LEXIS 129 (S.C. 1998).

Pincite

505 S.E.2d 593 (In re Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.