In re Flowers

268 F. App'x 185
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2008
DocketNo. 07-4657
StatusPublished

This text of 268 F. App'x 185 (In re Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Flowers, 268 F. App'x 185 (3d Cir. 2008).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Alfred Flowers is confined at FCI Fairton in New Jersey. On April 19, 2007, he filed a complaint, and, subsequently, furnished the District Court with copies of a summons and civil complaint for service upon each defendant in the action. After a few months of inactivity in the District Court, Flowers filed the instant petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the court to order the clerk to serve the summons and complaint to each defendant. However, on January 2, 2008, the District Court issued an order directing that service of process be initiated upon the defendants. On January 3, 2008, [186]*186the Clerk issued copies of the summons and complaint to each defendant. Because Flowers has now received the relief he sought in filing his mandamus petition, we will deny his mandamus petition as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-flowers-ca3-2008.