In re Flournoy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Flournoy

865 So. 2d 708, 2004 WL 260311

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 13, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-0015·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that George A. Flournoy, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that George A. Flournoy, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5620, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Flournoy, 865 So. 2d 708, 2004 WL 260311 (La. 2004).

Pincite

865 So. 2d 708 (In re Flournoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related