In Re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

641 So. 2d 343, 1994 WL 474911
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 14, 1994·No. 82320·Published

Opinion

641 So.2d 343 (1994)

In re FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS, AND PROPOSED FLORIDA RULES FOR COURT-APPOINTED ARBITRATORS.

No. 82320.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 14, 1994.

Lawrence M. Watson, Jr., Chair, Mediation and Arbitration Rules Committee, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Orlando, for petitioner.

Stephan W. Carter, County Court Judge, Orange County, Orlando, on behalf of Conference of County Court Judges of FL.

Mark Hicks, Hicks, Anderson & Blum, P.A., Miami, on behalf of Physicians Protective Trust Fund, Tudor Ins. Co., Travelers Indem. Co., Western World Ins. Group, and Church Mutual Ins. Co.

Alan L. Landsberg, Law Offices of Alan L. Landsberg, Hollywood, on behalf of ITT Hartford.

Jack William Shaw, Jr., Jacksonville, on behalf of FL Defense Lawyers' Ass'n.

Todd Hogan, Vice-President, Claims Legal Services, Hollywood, on behalf of CNA Ins. Companies.

Henry P. Trawick, Jr., as a member of FL Bar, Sarasota, responding.

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Mediation and Arbitration Rules petitions this Court to amend the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators, and to create the Florida Rules for Court-Appointed Arbitrators. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution.

The proposed amendments were advertised and the Court received comments from interested parties. The Committee recommends that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720(b) be amended to more narrowly define the scope of settlement authority a representative of an involved insurance carrier must bring to the mediation conference. The insurance carriers who commented on the amendment argue that it is both cost prohibitive and logistically impractical for insurance companies to send their highest level decision makers to every mediation proceeding involving a company policy. We believe, however, that the insurance companies' concerns are partially allayed by the provision which allows the court to provide relief from the appearance requirement upon proper motion. Because the mediation process has proven to be most successful when the parties are physically present and fully prepared to settle, we adopt the Committee's amendment to rule 1.720(b).

The Committee, in conjunction with the Conference of County Court Judges of Florida, also proposes that rule 1.750 be amended to apply to the mediation of county court actions. The proposed amendment sets forth the guidelines for referring cases to mediation, appointment of the mediator, and the appearance requirements for small claims actions and other county court actions.

The Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators have been amended to place mediator certification exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court. In addition, a Mediator Qualifications Advisory Panel will be created to provide mediators with interpretations of the rules and guidance on standards of conduct.

We also accept the Committee's recommendation that we adopt Rules for Court-Ordered Arbitrators. As stated in the preamble to Rule for Court-Appointed Arbitrators 11.030, the rules are intended to instill and promote public confidence in arbitration and to be a guide to arbitrator conduct. The rules establish the standards of professional conduct, the professional and educational qualifications for arbitrators, and the procedural rules to be followed in arbitration. We believe that the creation of these rules will benefit both the parties and the arbitrators in improving the efficiency and the effectiveness *344 of this alternative dispute resolution process.

Accordingly, we adopt the amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators, and the new Florida Rules for Court-Appointed Arbitrators as reflected in the appendix of this opinion. The new language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by strike-through type. These rules shall become effective July 1, 1994.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

RULE 1.700 RULES COMMON TO MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION

(a) Referral by Presiding Judge or by Stipulation.

Except as hereinafter provided or as otherwise prohibited by law, the presiding judge may enter an order any contested civil matter or selected issues referred to mediation or arbitration referring all or any part of a contested civil matter to mediation or arbitration. The parties to any contested civil matter may file a written stipulation to mediate or arbitrate any issue between them at any time. Such stipulation shall be incorporated into the order of referral.

...

(2) Notice. Within 1015 days after the order of referral the designation of the mediator or the arbitrator, the court or its designee, who may be the mediator or the chief arbitrator, shall notify the parties in writing of the date, time, and place of the conference or hearing unless the order of referral specifies the date, time, and place.

(b) Motion to Dispense with Mediation and Arbitration.

A party may move, within 15 days after the order of referral, to dispense with mediation or arbitration if:

(1) the issue to be considered has been previously mediated or arbitrated between the same parties pursuant to Florida law;

(2) the issue presents a question of law only;

(3) the order violates rule 1.710(b) or rule 1.800; or

(4) other good cause is shown.

... .

RULE 1.710 MEDIATION RULES

... .

(b) Exclusions from Mediation. The following actions shall not be referred to mediation except upon petition of all parties A civil action shall be ordered to mediation or mediation in conjunction with arbitration upon stipulation of the parties. A civil action may be ordered to mediation or mediation in conjunction with arbitration upon motion of any party or by the court, if the judge determines the action to be of such a nature that mediation could be of benefit to the litigants or the court. Under no circumstances may the following categories of actions be referred to mediation:

(1)        Appeals from rulings of administrative
           agencies.
(2) (1)    Bond estreatures.
(3)        Forfeitures of seized property
(4) (2)    Habeas corpus and extraordinary writs.
(5) (3)    Bond validations.
(4)        Civil or criminal contempt; or
(6)        Declaratory relief.
(7) (5)    Other matters as may be specified by
           administrative order of the chief judge
           in the circuit.

*345 (c) Discovery. Discovery may continue throughout mediation. Unless stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, the mediation process shall not suspend discovery.

Committee Note

The Supreme Court Committee on Mediation and Arbitration Rules encourages crafting a combination of dispute resolution processes without creating an unreasonable barrier to the traditional court system.

RULE 1.720 MEDIATION PROCEDURES

...

(b) Sanctions for Failure to Appear. If a party fails to appear at a duly noticed mediation conference without good cause, the court upon motion shall impose sanctions, including an award of mediator and attorneys' fees and other costs, against the party failing to appear.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 641 So. 2d 343, 1994 WL 474911 (Fla. 1994).

641 So. 2d 343 (In Re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.