In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

139 So. 2d 129, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3032
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 139 So. 2d 129 (In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 139 So. 2d 129, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3032 (Fla. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The attached amendments and revisions of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are hereby approved and adopted, the same to become effective July 1, 1962. All rules, parts of rules, statutes or parts of statutes inconsistent with the amendments hereby approved and adopted are hereby repealed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, TLIOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Paragraph (a) of Rule 1.7 is amended to read as follows:

(a) Pleadings. There shall be a complaint and an answer; and there shall be a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer.

Paragraph (e) of Rule 1.7 is deleted and the following is substituted:

(e) Motion in Lieu of Scire Eacias. Any relief available by scire facias is grantable on motion after notice without the issuance of a writ of scire facias.

The Title to Rule 1.7 is amended to read:

RULE 1.7. PLEADINGS; MOTIONS.

RULE 1.20 is amended to read as follows :

RULE 1.20. CONSOLIDATION; SEPARATE TRIALS.

(a) Consolidation. When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.

(b) Separate Trials. The court in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or issues.

Subdivisions (a) and (b) of Rule 1.35 are amended to read as follows:

(a) Voluntary Dismissal; Effect thereof.

(1) By Plaintiff; By Stipulation. Subject to provisions hereof, except in actions in replevin or proceedings wherein property has been seized or is in the custody of the court, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment or decree, whichever first occurs, or (ii) by filing stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action.

Without Prejudice, When. Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of this state an action based on or including the same claim.

(2) By order of Court; if Counterclaim. Except as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision of this rule, an action shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff’s instance save upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. If a counterclaim has been served by a defendant prior to the service upon him of the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, the action shall not be dismissed against defendant’s objections unless the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court.

[130]*130Without Prejudice. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under the foregoing paragraph is without prejudice.

(b) Involuntary Dismissal. For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against him.

After the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. In an action tried by the court without a jury the court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence.

With Prejudice. Unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under the foregoing paragraph, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue or for the lack of an indispensable party, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.

RULE 1.32. WITNESSES, EXPERT, DEPOSITIONS.

(1) The term “expert witness” as used herein applies exclusively to a person duly and regularly engaged in the practice of his profession, who holds a professional degree from a university or college and has had special professional training and experience, or one possessed of special knowledge or skill in respect of the subject upon which he is called to testify.

(2) The testimony of any expert or skilled witness may be taken at any time before the trial of any civil cause in any of the courts of this state, in equity or at common law, upon reasonable notice, in the manner now provided for taking depositions under Rule 1.21 or Rule 1.22, notwithstanding the residence of the witness. Provided, however, that the court may, upon proper objection by opposing counsel, pursuant to due notice, disallow the taking of such deposition, and require the attendance of such witness in person at the trial of the cause, if the court finds that the personal appearance of such witness at the trial shall be necessary to insure a fair and impartial trial. Such objection shall be made to the court prior to the taking of the deposition, otherwise the same may be used in evidence, if otherwise admissible.

(3) An expert or skilled witness, whose deposition is taken, shall be allowed a witness fee, in such reasonable amount as the trial judge may determine, and the same shall be taxed as costs.

(4) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the taking of any deposition as otherwise provided by law.

RULE 1.38 is amended to read as follows :

RULE 1.38. RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, DECREES OR ORDERS.

(a) Clerical Mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency of an appeal, such mistakes may be so corrected before the record on appeal is docketed in the appellate court, and thereafter while the appeal is pending may be so corrected with leave of the appellate court.

(b) Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, decree, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial or rehearing; (3) fraud (whether heretofore [131]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thoman v. Ashley
170 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Evans v. Hydeman
168 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lewis
167 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Suritz v. Kelner
155 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.
150 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 2d 129, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-fla-1962.