In re Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission

240 So. 2d 465, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2353
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 8, 1970
DocketNo. 39911
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 So. 2d 465 (In re Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, 240 So. 2d 465, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2353 (Fla. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Florida Constitution art. V, § 17A, F.S.A., creates a Judicial Qualifications Commission and directs this Court to make rules providing for the procedure before the Commission and the referees, as well as the extent to which communications shall be privileged or confidential.

By its opinion effective March 6, 1968, this Court approved and adopted appropriate rules which were considered sufficient to effectuate this Court’s responsibility under the circumstances. Experience has now indicated the advisability for a complete revision of the existing rules. The rules promulgated by this Court under date of March 6, 1968, governing the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Case No. 36940, are hereby repealed and declared to be of no effect upon the effective date of the rules hereinafter promulgated. In lieu of the aforementioned rules adopted March 6, 1968, to become effective upon the filing of this opinion, the following rules governing the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission are hereby approved and adopted:

FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION RULES

Rule 1. SCOPE AND TITLE

These rules apply to all proceedings before the Judicial Qualifications Commission and referees involving the discipline, retirement or removal of justices of the supreme court and judges of the district courts of appeal and circuit courts, pursuant to section 17A, Article V of the Constitution of the State of Florida. These rules shall be known and cited as Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission Rules and may be abbreviated as “FJQCR.”

Rule 2. DEFINITIONS

In these rules, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:

(a) “Commission” means the Judicial Qualifications Commission.

(b) “Judge” means a justice of the supreme court and a judge of a district court of appeal, circuit court and court of record of Escambia County.

(c) “Chairman” includes the acting chairman.

(d) “Referees” means special referees appointed by the Supreme Court upon request of the Commission.

(e) “Presiding referee” means the ref-feree so designated by the Supreme Court or, in the absence of such designation, the justice or judge first named in the order appointing referees.

(f) “Counsel” means the lawyer designated by the Commission to gather and present evidence before the referees or Commission with respect to the charges against a judge and to represent the Commission before the Supreme Court in connection with any proceedings before said court.

(g) “Shall” is mandatory and “may” is permissive.

(h) “Mail” and “mailed” include ordinary mail and personal delivery.

(i) The masculine gender includes the feminine gender.

Rule 3. JURISDICTION AND POWERS

The Commission shall have such jurisdiction and powers as are necessary to conduct the proper and speedy disposition of any investigation or hearing, including the power to compel the attendance of witnesses, to take or cause to be taken the depo[466]*466sition of witnesses to order the production of books, records or other documentary evidence and the power of contempt. Any member of the Commission and any referee shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations to witnesses in any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission.

Rule 4. OFFICERS OF COMMISSION

The Commission shall elect a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman, each of whom shall serve for a term of two years. The Vice-Chairman shall act as the chairman of the Commission in the absence of the Chairman. The Commission may select an executive secretary.

Rule 5. QUORUM OF COMMISSION

A quorum for the transaction of business by the Commission shall be six members of the Commission except as otherwise provided in these rules.

Rule 6. COMPLAINT AND INVESTIGATION

(a) The Commission, upon receiving a statement under oath, not obviously unfounded or frivolous, alleging facts indicating that a judge is guilty of willful or persistent failure to perform his duties or habitual intemperance or conduct unbecoming a member of the judiciary or that he has a disability seriously interfering with the performance of his duties, which is, or is likely to become, permanent in nature, shall make such an investigation by one or more members to determine whether formal proceedings should be instituted and a hearing held. The Commission may make such investigation on its own motion.

(b) The judge has no right to be present or to be heard during an investigation, but before the Commission determines that there is sufficient cause to warrant formal proceedings, the judge shall be notified of the investigation, the nature of the charge, and the name of the person making the statement, if any, or that the investigation is on the Commission’s own motion, and, shall be afforded reasonable opportunity to make a statement, personally or by counsel, verbally or in writing, ’ sworn or unsworn, explaining, refuting or admitting the alleged misconduct or disability. The judge shall not have the right to present other testimony or evidence, and he shall not have the right of confrontation or cross-examination of the person making the verified statement or any person interviewed, called or interrogated by the Commission. Such notification shall be given by registered or certified mail addressed to the judge at his chambers and at his last known residence.

(c) If the investigation does not disclose sufficient cause to warrant further proceedings, the judge shall be so notified.

(d) If the investigation does disclose sufficient cause to warrant further proceedings, the Commission shall designate one or more counsel who shall be members of The Florida Bar and who shall prepare appropriate papers and pleadings, gather and present evidence before the Commission or referees with respect to the charges against the judge, and otherwise act as counsel in connection with the prosecution of the charges against the judge including the representation of the Commission before the Supreme Court in connection with any proceedings before said court.

Rule 7. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS

(a) After the investigation has been completed, if the Commission concludes that formal proceedings should be instituted it shall direct the counsel designated by the Commission without delay to give written notice to the judge advising him of the institution of formal proceedings to inquire into the charges against him. Such proceedings shall be entitled:

“BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION

Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No._”

(b) The notice shall be issued in the name of the Commission and specify in ordinary and concise language the charges against the judge and the alleged facts [467]*467upon which such charges are based, and shall advise the judge of his right to file a written answer to the charges against him within 20 days after service of the notice upon him. A charge shall be sufficient if it recites the general language of a charge in Rule 6 and may specify the facts relied upon to support a particular charge.

(c) The notice shall be served personally on the judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge [Joseph A. BOYD, Jr.] No. 74-18
308 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
In Re Boyd
308 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
In re Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission
276 So. 2d 10 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 So. 2d 465, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-florida-judicial-qualifications-commission-fla-1970.