In Re Florida Evidence Code

675 So. 2d 584, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 953, 1996 WL 296634
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 1996
Docket87368
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 584 (In Re Florida Evidence Code) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Florida Evidence Code, 675 So. 2d 584, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 953, 1996 WL 296634 (Fla. 1996).

Opinion

675 So.2d 584 (1996)

In re FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE.

No. 87368.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 6, 1996.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

This Court has jurisdiction to adopt rules of practice and procedure under article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution.

The Florida Evidence Code[1] enacted by the Legislature is both substantive and procedural. We previously adopted provisions of the Evidence Code as court rules insofar as they deal with procedural matters. In re Florida Evidence Code, 372 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 1979), clarified by In re Florida Evidence Code, 376 So.2d 1161 (Fla.1979). We also have adopted amendments to the Evidence Code as court rules to the extent that they are procedural. E.g., In re Florida Evidence Code, 638 So.2d 920 (Fla.1993); In re Amendment of Florida Evidence Code, 497 So.2d 239 (Fla.1986); In re Amendment of Florida Evidence Code, 404 So.2d 743 (Fla. 1981).

The Florida Bar has petitioned this Court to amend the Rules of Evidence to conform to statutory changes in the Evidence Code. The changes at issue are: Ch. 80-155, §§ 1-5, 7-9, Laws of Fla.; Ch. 94-124, § 12, Laws of Fla.; Ch. 95-147, §§ 471-504, 1378, Laws of Fla.; Ch. 95-158, § 1, Laws of Fla.; Ch. 95-179, § 1, Laws of Fla.; Ch. 95-187, § 7, Laws of Fla.; and Ch. 95-286, § 5, Laws of Fla.

We adopt the amendments to the Evidence Code to the extent that they concern court procedure. These amended rules are effective on the dates the bills became law.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] §§ 90.101-.958, Fla.Stat. (1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co.
258 So. 3d 1219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code
210 So. 3d 1231 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
XL SPECIALTY INS. v. Aircraft Holdings
929 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Veilleux
859 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
In Re Amendments to Fla. Evidence Code
782 So. 2d 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Citizens Nat. Bank & Trust v. Stockwell
675 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 584, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 241, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 953, 1996 WL 296634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-florida-evidence-code-fla-1996.