In Re Florida Bar, Rules of Civil Procedure

339 So. 2d 626
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 13, 1976
Docket49249
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 339 So. 2d 626 (In Re Florida Bar, Rules of Civil Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Florida Bar, Rules of Civil Procedure, 339 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 1976).

Opinion

339 So.2d 626 (1976)

In re THE FLORIDA BAR, RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

No. 49249.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 25, 1976.
On Rehearing November 5, 1976.
As Modified December 13, 1976.

Edward J. Atkins, President, for The Florida Bar, Miami, Theodore J. Babbitt, Chairman, West Palm Beach and Robert C. Scott, Immediate-Past Chairman, Fort Lauderdale, for the Civil Procedure Rules Committee, petitioner.

Henry P. Trawick, Jr., Sarasota.

PER CURIAM.

Appended to this order are amended and new rules which govern all proceedings within their scope after 12:01 a.m., January 1, 1977.

All conflicting rules and statutes are hereby superseded, and any statute not superseded shall remain in effect as a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.

The committee notes are not adopted by the Court.

It is so ordered.

*627 OVERTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 1.020. COURT ADMINISTRATION.
  (f) Duty to rule within a reasonable time. It shall be the
duty of every judge to rule upon and announce his order or
judgment on every matter submitted to him within a reasonable
time. Each judge shall maintain a log of cases he holds under
advisement and advise the chief judge of his circuit at the end
of each calendar month of each case which he has held under
advisement for more than sixty days.
  (g) Neglect of duty. The failure of any judge, clerk,
prosecutor, public defender, court reporter, or other officer of
the court to comply with an order or directive of the chief judge
shall be considered neglect of duty and shall be reported to the
chief justice of the supreme court. The chief justice may report
such neglect of duty by a judge to the Judicial Qualifications
Commission or such neglect of duty by other officials to the
Governor of Florida, as may be appropriate.
RULE 1.030. ATTORNEYS.
  (a) Pleadings to be signed by attorney. Every pleading and
other paper of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed
by at least one attorney of record in his individual name whose
address and telephone number (including area code) shall be
stated and who shall be duly licensed to practice law in Florida.
He may be required by order of court to vouch for his authority
to represent and to give the address of such party. Except when
otherwise specifically provided by these rules or an applicable
statute, pleadings as such need not be verified or accompanied by
affidavit. The signature of an attorney shall constitute a
certificate by him that he has read the pleading or other paper;
that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief there
is good ground to support it and that it is not interposed for
delay. If a pleading is not signed or is signed with intent to
defeat the purpose of this rule, it may be stricken and the
action may proceed as though the pleading or other paper had not
been served.
  (b) Party not represented by attorney to sign. A party who
has no attorney but represents himself shall sign his pleading or
other paper and state his address and telephone number (including
area code).
Committee Note: Subdivisions (a)-(b) have been amended to
require the addition of the filing party's telephone number on
all pleadings and papers filed.
RULE 1.080. SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND PAPERS.
  (a) Service; When Required. Unless the court otherwise
orders, every pleading subsequent to the initial pleading and
every other paper filed in the action, except applications for
witness subpoena, shall be served on each party. No service need
be made on parties against whom a default has been entered,
except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims against
them shall be served in the manner provided for service of
summons.
  (h) Service of orders.
  (1) A copy of all orders or judgments shall be transmitted by
the court or under its direction to all parties at the time of
entry of the order or judgment. No service need be made on
parties against whom a default has been entered except orders
setting a cause for trial as prescribed in Rule 1.440(c) and
final judgments that shall be prepared and served as provided in
subdivision (h)(2). The court may require that orders or
judgments be prepared by a party and may require that proposed
orders or judgments be furnished to all parties before entry by
the court of the order or judgment.
Committee Note: The amendment made to this rule on July 26,
1972 [See In re The Florida Bar: Rules of Civil Procedure, 265 So.2d 21
(Fla. 1972)], was intended according to the Committee
Notes "[t]o assure that all parties had an opportunity to see the
proposed
*628 form [of order] before entry by the court." [Id. at 23]. This
change followed on the heels of the 1971 amendment, which the
Committee felt had been confusing.
  Two changes have been made to subdivision (h)(1), which have
resulted in a wholesale redrafting of the rule. First, the
provision requiring the submission of proposed orders to all
counsel prior to entry by the court has been deleted, any
inaccuracies in an order submitted to the court being remediable
either by the court's own vigilance or later application by an
interested party. Secondly, the rule now requires that conformed
copies of any order entered by the court must be mailed to all
parties of record in all instances (and to defaulted parties in
two specified instances), for purposes of advising them of the
date of the court's action as well as the substance of such
action. Nothing in this new rule is meant to limit the power of
the court to delegate the ministerial function of preparing
orders.
RULE 1.310. DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION.
  (b) Notice of Examination. General Requirements; Special
Notice; Non-Stenographic Recording; Production of Documents and
Things; Deposition of Organization.
  (4) Upon motion, the court shall, subject to the provisions of
Rule 1.280(c), order that the testimony at a deposition be
recorded on video tape and may order that the testimony at a
deposition be recorded by other than stenographic means at the
initial cost of the movant. The order shall designate the manner
of recording, preserving and filing the deposition and may
include other provisions to assure that the recorded testimony
will be accurate and trustworthy. A party may nevertheless
arrange for a stenographic transcription at his own initial
expense. The court may adopt a standard order governing the use
of video tape depositions which may be automatically applicable
upon the giving of notice of taking any video tape deposition
unless modified upon the application of any party.
Committee Note: Subdivision (b)(4) has been amended to allow
the taking of a video tape deposition as a matter of right.
Provisions for the taxation of costs and the entry of a standard
order are included as well. This new amendment allows the
contemporaneous stenographic transcription of a video tape
deposition.
RULE 1.340. INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES.
  (e) Form. The interrogatories shall be so arranged that a
blank space shall be provided after each separately numbered
interrogatory. The space shall be reasonably calculated to enable
the answering party to insert the answer within the space. If
sufficient space is not provided, the answering party may attach
additional papers with answers and refer to them in the space
provided in the interrogatories. The original of the
interrogatories and a copy shall be served on the party to whom
the interrogatories are directed and copies on all other parties
as provided in Rule 1.080. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowd v. State
227 So. 3d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Chemrock Corp. v. Tampa Electric Co.
71 So. 3d 786 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
Wilson v. Salamon
923 So. 2d 363 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Smith v. DeLoach
556 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
West v. West
534 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Giraldo v. Cossin
399 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Barnes v. Ross
386 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
B/G AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. Mystery Fun House
381 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Schwab & Co., Inc. v. BREEZY BAY
360 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
State ex rel. McCrimmon v. Lester
354 So. 2d 381 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 So. 2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-florida-bar-rules-of-civil-procedure-fla-1976.