In re Florida Bar

225 So. 2d 881, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2215
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 11, 1969·No. No. 38308·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This cause came on to be heard, pursuant to notice duly published in the Florida Bar Journal, upon the Petition of the Florida Bar for Amendment of Article XI of the Integration Rule relating to disciplinary procedures. The matter was duly argued before the Court, en banc, April 10th, 1969, by counsel for the Florida Bar; Honorable Parks Carmichael of the Gainesville Bar, an objector to the amendment; Honorable Willard Ayres of the Ocala Bar, an objector to the amendment; Honorable Paul A. Louis of the Miami Bar, an objector to the amendment. Upon consideration of such argument and of the briefs filed in this cause by the respective parties together with the “Motion of Individual Attorney” Bernard J. Penn of the Pensacola Bar, the Court finds that, with the exceptions hereafter noted, the petition should be granted and Article XI of the Integration Rule should be amended and revised as set forth in the proposed Rule attached to said Petition.

I.

Article XI of the Integration Rule as proposed in the Petition of The Florida Bar is hereby adopted with the following revisions, deletions and additions, viz:

1. The following language in Rule 11.02 (4) is stricken:
[A]nd each member of The Florida Bar shall maintain complete books of account (including supporting documents) relating to all monies of any client so entrusted to him, recording therein the times and amounts of all receipts and disbursements and the basis or necessity therefor. Such records shall be preserved for not less than six years subsequent to the transactions therein described, shall be available for reasonable inspection by the client, and shall be produced by the member of The Florida Bar upon request for inspection by a grievance committee, referee or the Board of Governors, when such committee, referee or Board is conducting proceedings pursuant to these rules wherein such records or the transactions therein described or which should therein be described are relevant.
2. All of Rule 11.03(2) (d) is stricken and the following inserted in lieu thereof, viz :1
Terms. The terms of the members shall begin on the first day of July and shall end on the next succeeding 30th day of June or until such time as their successors are appointed and qualified. Continuous service of a member shall not exceed two (2) years, nor shall any member be reappointed for a period of five (5) years after the end of his term: Provided, however, the expiration of the term of any member shall not disqualify such member from con-[882] eluding any investigation then pending before him.
3. Rule 11.03(3) is amended by adding the following language thereto: “All retired Supreme Court, District Court of Appeal and Circuit Judges shall be eligible, with their consent, to serve as referee.”
4. Rule 11.09(3) (c) is stricken and the following inserted in lieu thereof:
The party first seeking review shall file a brief in support of the petition for review at the time of the filing of the petition. The opposing party shall file an answering brief within twenty (20) days after the service of the brief of the party seeking review, which answering brief shall also support any cross-petition for review. The party originally seeking review may file a reply brief within ten (10) days after the service of the answering brief.
5. Rule 11.09(3) (d) is stricken and the following inserted in lieu thereof:
Request for oral argument shall be filed in every case wherein a petition for review is filed, at the time of filing the first brief. If no request is filed the case will be disposed of without oral argument.
6. Rule 11.11(1) (b) is stricken and the following inserted in lieu thereof:
The petition shall be in such form and shall be accompanied by such exhibits as the Board of Governors shall prescribe. The information required concerning the petitioner may include any or all of the following matters in addition to such other matters as may be reasonably required to determine the fitness of the petitioner to resume the practice of law: criminal and civil judgments; disciplinary judgments; copies of income tax returns together with consents to secure original returns; occupation during disbarment and information in connection therewith; financial statements; statement of restitution of funds which were the subject matter of disciplinary proceedings.
7.Strike the words “two (2) years” in Rule 11.11(11) and insert in lieu thereof the words “one (1) year.”

II.

The Court considers the expeditious disposition of disciplinary proceedings under the Rule hereby approved to be essential to proper and efficient administration of justice in this state, and the protection of the public and the member of the bar being investigated. All persons charged with any responsibility under this rule shall give priority in the performance of his duties to the solemn obligations imposed under this Rule.

III.

This Rule shall take effect June 30, 1969, at midnight. All proceedings in which formal complaints have been filed on June 30, 1969, or prior thereto, shall be governed by the Rule presently in force.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

EXHIBIT

Article XI, as Revised, Effective June 30, 1969

Article XI

RULES OF DISCIPLINE

The exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over the discipline of persons admitted to the practice of law shall be administered in the following manner subject to the supervision and review of the Court.

RULE 11.01: PRINCIPLES AND DEFINITIONS

(1) Notice and knowledge of rules. Every member of The Florida Bar is [883] within the jurisdiction of this Court and its agencies under this Rule and is charged with notice and held to know the provisions of this rule and the standards of ethical and professional conduct prescribed by this Court.

(2) Process. Every member of The Florida Bar is charged with notice of the provisions of Section 6 of Article II relating to change of mailing address or military status and that mailing by registered or certified mail of papers or notices prescribed in these rules to the last mailing address of an attorney as shown by the official records in the office of the Executive Director of The Florida Bar shall be sufficient notice and service unless this Court shall direct otherwise.

(3) Definitions. Wherever used in these rules the following words or terms shall have the meaning herein set forth unless the use thereof shall clearly indicate a different meaning:

(a) The accused or accused attorney: a member of The Florida Bar who has been accused of misconduct or whose conduct is under investigation, but as to which conduct there has been no finding of either probable cause or no probable cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Florida Bar, 225 So. 2d 881, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2215 (Fla. 1969).

225 So. 2d 881 (In re Florida Bar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Florida Bar v. Prior
330 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
In re Florida Bar
301 So. 2d 446 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Florida Bar v. Anderson
240 So. 2d 152 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Florida Bar v. Pink
236 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)