In re Florida Appellate Rules

139 So. 2d 139, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3037
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 2d 139 (In re Florida Appellate Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Florida Appellate Rules, 139 So. 2d 139, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3037 (Fla. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The attached amendments and revisions of the Florida Appellate Rules are hereby approved and adopted, the same to become effective July 1st, 1962. All rules, parts of rules, statutes or parts of statutes inconsistent with the amendments and rules hereby approved and adopted are hereby repealed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Rule 2.1 a (2) (a) be and the same is hereby amended by adding thereto a sentence at the end thereof reading as follows, viz:

“The, Chief Justice shall have the power to order consolidation of such cases as he deems necessary.”

Rule 2.1 a (4) (c) be and the same is hereby amended by striking all of said rule and inserting in lieu thereof a new rule 2.1 a (4) (c) to read as follows, viz:

“(c) When any circuit judge is unable to perform the duties of his office on account of absence, sickness, disqualification or other disability, or because of assignment to special duty, or when necessary for the prompt dispatch of the business of the court, said circuit judge or the presiding judge of such circuit shall so advise the chief justice, who shall assign a justice of the Supreme Court, a judge of the district court, or judge of another circuit, to perform the duties of such judge; provided, however, that no order of assignment shall be necessary if there be another judge or judges of the circuit available to perform the duties of such judge, or the presiding judge may allocate the business of such judge to any judge or judges of the circuit; provided further, that should any judge be disqualified or recuse himself in any cause, such cause shall be reassigned to another judge in accordance with the local rules or practice of said circuit for assignment of business to the judges thereof.”

Rule 2.3 b be and the same is hereby amended by striking said rule and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

“b. Practice by Foreign Attorneys. Upon motion duly filed with the Court supported by proof that an attorney is a member in good standing of the Bar of another [140]*140state and that, under the rules of comity of such state, attorneys of Florida are similarly permitted to appear, attorneys of other states may be permitted to appear in particular cases in the Court, provided requests for such appearances have been made and granted prior to oral argument in the cause. Attorneys of other states shall not do a general practice in the Court unless they are members of The 'Florida Bar in good standing.”

Rule 2.3 d (3) be and the same is hereby amended by striking said rule and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

“(3) Additional Attorneys. After an appeal or other proceeding has been filed or docketed in the Court, additional authorized attorneys may appear and participate, prior to the time the cause is presented to the Court for decision on the merits, without the necessity of securing permission of the Court on filing written appearance in the office of the Clerk of the Court and serving a copy thereof upon opposing counsel prior to its filing.
“After the date any cause in the Court is presented to the Court for a decision on the merits, no additional attorneys other than the original attorneys of record or those who have noted their appearance in said cause prior to the date the same is presented to the Court for a decision on the merits shall be permitted to appear or participate therein except upon leave of the Court for good cause shown, and provided a copy of the application for leave to appear shall have been served upon opposing counsel at least five days prior to the entry of any order allowing such appearance.”

Rule 3.2 a, Florida Appellate Rules, as amended May 18, 1960, be and the same is hereby further amended by striking all of said rule and inserting in lieu thereof a new rule 3.2 to read as follows, viz:

“a. Method. An appeal shall be commenced by filing a notice of appeal and depositing the filing fee prescribed by law, which may be by check or money order payable to the clerk of the appellate court, with the clerk of the lower court. Within five days after the notice is so filed, the clerk of the lower court shall transmit a certified copy thereof to the clerk of the appellate court together with such filing fee. The copy so certified shall contain a certificate of the clerk of the lower court showing the date of the filing of such notice of appeal. Other proceedings shall be commenced by filing the initial pleading with the clerk of the Court and paying him the filing fee prescribed by law.”

Rule 3.2 d, Florida Appellate Rules, be and the same is hereby amended by adding thereto the following, viz:

“Any reviewable interlocutory order entered in any cause subsequent to the entry of the final judgment or decree but prior to the filing of the notice of appeal may be reviewed by the appellate court in the same manner as reviewable interlocutory orders entered prior to the date of such final judgment or decree. When appeal is from a final judgment or decree, it shall not be necessary to designate such, interlocutory orders by time and place of record in the notice of appeal. In such cases they shall be reviewable as so described in the assignments of error.”

Rule 3.2 f, Florida Appellate Rules, be and the same is hereby amended by striking all of said rule and inserting in lieu thereof a new Rule 3.2 f to read as follows:

“f. Payment of Costs by Original Plaintiff. No appeal may be taken by the original plaintiff in any suit or proceeding until he shall have first paid all costs that have accrued in and about the suit, and have been specifically taxed against him, up to the time the appeal is taken; provided, that nothing contained herein shall require the prepayment of costs by the original plaintiff when he has assigned as error the taxation of costs and has superseded the order, judgment or decree specifically taxing the same; provided further, that in those in[141]*141stances where the costs are not settled until after the notice of appeal is filed, the party obligated shall be required to pay the same within ten (10) days upon written demand, otherwise said appeal shall be dismissed upon motion.”

Rule 3.6 a he and the same is hereby amended to read as follows, viz:

“a. What Constitutes. The record-on-appeal shall consist either of an original record or a transcript of record, or a stipulated statement prepared in accordance with these rules. A transcript of record shall be used only when so ordered by the lower court or stipulated by the parties. Appellant, may, however, use a transcript as a matter of right if he elects to assume the cost thereof, which shall not be taxable as costs. Where a transcript of record instead of the original record is used, such transcript shall be printed, typewritten or duplicated in a clear readable manner such as by mimeograph on opaque white un-glossed paper not to exceed in size 8i/H x 14 inches. Lettering shall he black and distinct type, double spaced and with margins no less than one inch. Lettering in transcript or type made in imitation of handwriting will not be permitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 2d 139, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 3037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-florida-appellate-rules-fla-1962.