In re Florentino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Florentino

92 A.D.2d 797, 460 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17173

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Florentino. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 A.D.2d 56 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Respondent is directed to show cause why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made and respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York pending final determination of the petition, effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Respondent is directed to show cause why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made and respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York pending final determination of the petition, effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

In re Florentino, 92 A.D.2d 797, 460 N.Y.S.2d 273, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 797 (In re Florentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.