In re Flick
105 F. 503, 13 Ohio F. Dec. 500, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37
Opinion
I have not considered all the questions discussed by the referee, but his order disallowing the claims above mentioned is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Flick, 105 F. 503, 13 Ohio F. Dec. 500, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37 (S.D. Ohio 1900).
105 F. 503 (In re Flick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Sleep Products, Inc., Bankrupt
141 F. Supp. 463 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Sampsell
172 F.2d 400 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)
In re Herbert Candy Co.
43 F. Supp. 588 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1942)
In re Standard Wood Products Co.
38 F. Supp. 20 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1941)
Blauvelt v. Walker
72 F.2d 915 (Fourth Circuit, 1934)
In re Bowman Hardware & Electric Co.
3 F. Supp. 82 (E.D. Illinois, 1932)
In re Friedman
164 F. 131 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1908)