In re Fleming

442 F. App'x 26
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2304
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 26 (In re Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fleming, 442 F. App'x 26 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Marquis Fleming petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on a motion for reconsideration filed in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied Fleming’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Fleming’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also deny as moot Fleming’s motions to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F. App'x 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fleming-ca4-2011.