In re Fleisher

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fleisher

759 A.2d 847, 165 N.J. 501, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1231

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DOUGLAS J. FLEISHER of NORTH BERGEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to surrender file on termination of representation) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOUGLAS J. FLEISHER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that DOUGLAS J. FLEISHER of NORTH BERGEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to surrender file on termination of representation) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOUGLAS J. FLEISHER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Fleisher, 759 A.2d 847, 165 N.J. 501, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1231 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

759 A.2d 847 (In re Fleisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.