In re Fleckenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fleckenstein

27 A.D.2d 184, 277 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 184 (In re Fleckenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fleckenstein, 27 A.D.2d 184, 277 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Judicial Department on March 6,1944. Respondent was charged with having been guilty of crime and misdemeanor, in violation of subdivision 2 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law and canons [185]*18529 and 32 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, predicated upon his conviction, in 1957, in New Jersey, of three counts of “ Lewdness or indecency” in violation of section 2A:115-1 of the New Jersey Statutes. The Referee correctly found that the charge was sustained. He thoroughly explored all the evidence submitted concerning the crimes of which respondent had been found guilty, as well as respondent’s fitness to continue as a member of the Bar.

Respondent should be disbarred.

Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ., concur.

. Respondent disbarred effective March 28, 1967.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Judicial Department on March 6,1944. Respondent was charged with having been guilty of crime and misdemeanor, in violation of subdivision 2 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law and canons [185]*18529 and 32 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, predicated upon his conviction, in 1957, in New Jersey, of three counts of “ Lewdness or indecency” in violation of section 2A:115-1 of the New Jersey Statutes. The Referee correctly found that the charge was sustained. He thoroughly explored all the evidence submitted concerning the crimes of which respondent had been found guilty, as well as respondent’s fitness to continue as a member of the Bar.

Respondent should be disbarred.

Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ., concur.

. Respondent disbarred effective March 28, 1967.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 184, 277 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fleckenstein-nyappdiv-1967.