In Re Fleckenstein

166 A.2d 753, 34 N.J. 20, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 10, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Respondent was convicted on two indictments charging acts of lewdness and carnal indecency in violation of N. J. 8. 2A :115-1, and placed on probation upon terms requiring submission to psychiatric treatment. His convictions were affirmed, State v. Fleckenstein, 60 N. J. Super. 399, certification denied 33 N. J. 109.

The offenses warrant striking respondent’s name from the rolls but since he obviously is ill, the stigma of disbarment should not be visited upon him. Accordingly he is suspended from the practice of law until the court shall otherwise order upon satisfactory proof of his cure.

*21 For suspension—Chief Justice Weiftratjb, and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctob, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—7.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Fleckenstein, 166 A.2d 753, 34 N.J. 20, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1961).

166 A.2d 753 (In Re Fleckenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Addonizio
469 A.2d 492 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
In Re Bourgeois
182 N.E.2d 651 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1962)