In re Flayer

650 A.2d 335, 138 N.J. 276, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 1287
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 9, 1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that JOSEPH F. FLAYER of BUDD LAKE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (failure to act with diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate and to explain a matter to extent necessary for client to make informed decisions) and RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and JOSEPH F. FLAYER is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Office of Attorney Ethics and the Disciplinary Review Board for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Flayer, 650 A.2d 335, 138 N.J. 276, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 1287 (N.J. 1994).

650 A.2d 335 (In re Flayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.