In re Flasphaler
228 F.2d 53, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 82
This text of 228 F.2d 53 (In re Flasphaler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Flasphaler, 228 F.2d 53, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 82 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
Opinion
We allowed this petition for a writ of mandamus to be filed so that we might consider the petitioner’s claim that it was the clear duty of the District Court to admit the petitioner to its bar. After hearing argument and being now fully advised, we find that mandamus does not lie. In re Jacobi, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 217 F.2d 668.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Jacobi
217 F.2d 668 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 F.2d 53, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-flasphaler-cadc-1955.