In re Flasphaler
228 F.2d 53, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 82
Opinion
We allowed this petition for a writ of mandamus to be filed so that we might consider the petitioner’s claim that it was the clear duty of the District Court to admit the petitioner to its bar. After hearing argument and being now fully advised, we find that mandamus does not lie. In re Jacobi, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 217 F.2d 668.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Flasphaler, 228 F.2d 53, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 82 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
228 F.2d 53 (In re Flasphaler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Jacobi
217 F.2d 668 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)