In re Flack

135 P.3d 157, 281 Kan. 841, 2006 Kan. LEXIS 243
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided May 10, 2006·No. No. 86,855·Published

Opinion

On October 26, 2001, this court placed the respondent, Stephen Paul Flack, on supervised probation for a 2-year period. See In re Flack, 272 Kan. 465, 33 P.3d 1281 (2001). The respondent’s supervising attorney, William G. Hammond, has submitted a letter to the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which he verified the respondent’s compliance with the conditions imposed upon him by this court. The respondent provided an affidavit to the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which he verified his compliance with the conditions imposed by this court. The Disciplinary Administrator’s office recommends that the respondent’s probation be terminated.

It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent’s 2-year supervised probation be terminated. It is further ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Flack, 135 P.3d 157, 281 Kan. 841, 2006 Kan. LEXIS 243 (kan 2006).

135 P.3d 157 (In re Flack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Flack
33 P.3d 1281 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2001)