In re Fitchett

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fitchett

729 A.2d 426, 158 N.J. 251, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 739

DecidedMay 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 729 A.2d 426 (In re Fitchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fitchett, 729 A.2d 426, 158 N.J. 251, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 739 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[252]*252ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 22, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that FREDERICK F. FITCHETT, III, of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERICK F. FITCHETT, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[252]*252ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 22, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that FREDERICK F. FITCHETT, III, of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FREDERICK F. FITCHETT, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

729 A.2d 426, 158 N.J. 251, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fitchett-nj-1999.