In re Fitch

2 Wend. 298
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 298 (In re Fitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fitch, 2 Wend. 298 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

By the Court, Savage, C. J.

The proceedings could be returned only to this court. No jurisdiction in these cases is given to the superior court of the city of New-York by the .statute creating that court. The judges of that court, however, have a right to act individually on applications to them under this act; but when they so officiate, they do so as commissioners of this court. The proof of the residence "abroad of the defendant was sufficient, but there should have been evidence that the defendant was indebted within this state, either by showing that the contract was made here, or that the creditors resided here. (2 Caines, 319.) In this respect there is a total want of evidence, for which cause the proceedings are set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burwell & Morford v. Seattle Plumbing Supply Co.
128 P.2d 859 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Anderson v. Anderson
29 N.E. 35 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Horn v. Indianapolis National Bank
9 L.R.A. 676 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Elsworth v. Muldoon
15 Abb. Pr. 440 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Husted v. Dakin
17 Abb. Pr. 137 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Furman v. Walter
13 How. Pr. 348 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Davis v. Ainsworth
14 How. Pr. 346 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Morgan v. Avery
7 Barb. 656 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Shepard v. O'Neil
4 Barb. 125 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Noble v. . Halliday
1 N.Y. 330 (New York Court of Appeals, 1848)
Halliday v. Noble
1 Barb. 137 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
People ex rel. McKnight v. Beebe
1 Barb. 379 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)
People ex rel. Fairbanks v. Griffith
1 Hill & Den. 447 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Kingsland v. Cowman & Gillender
5 Hill & Den. 608 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Ex parte Haynes
18 Wend. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)
In re Warner
3 Wend. 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fitch-nysupct-1829.