In re Fiske

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fiske

181 A.D. 953

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 953 (In re Fiske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fiske, 181 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Motions for stays denied, without costs. Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Stapleton, J., dissented upon the ground that the record fails to show that there are before the board of canvassers the data prescribed by statute

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motions for stays denied, without costs. Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Stapleton, J., dissented upon the ground that the record fails to show that there are before the board of canvassers the data prescribed by statute

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fiske-nyappdiv-1917.