Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Fishman

In re Fishman

3 A.D.3d 450, 771 N.Y.S.2d 638, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Fishman. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 A.D.3d 100 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 2004·Published

Opinion

Application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York denied. No opinion. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Rosenberger, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fishman, 3 A.D.3d 450, 771 N.Y.S.2d 638, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

3 A.D.3d 450 (In re Fishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.