In re Fisher

29 A.D.3d 71, 810 N.Y.S.2d 690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.3d 71 (In re Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fisher, 29 A.D.3d 71, 810 N.Y.S.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by the Appel[72]*72late Division, Third Department, on December 2, 1993, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Fishers. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of misconduct arising from his misuse of a trust account. Respondent filed an answer admitting the material allegations of the petition and appeared before this Court and submitted matters in mitigation.

Respondent admitted that he used as a personal account an account that was designated as a trust account and that he failed to use the account for client funds. Additionally, respondent admitted that he issued checks drawn against the account that were dishonored for insufficient funds.

By depositing funds other than “qualified funds” within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 497 (2) into a trust account, respondent has violated Judiciary Law § 497, and he has engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer, in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7]).

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation, including that the misconduct was unrelated to clients or clients’ funds. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Green, Pine and Hayes, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Places in Saratoga, LLC v. Izzo
2024 NY Slip Op 32940(U) (New York Supreme Court, Saratoga County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.3d 71, 810 N.Y.S.2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fisher-nyappdiv-2006.