In re Fishel Land Co.

3 Pa. D. & C.3d 231, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 39
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
DecidedSeptember 21, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pa. D. & C.3d 231 (In re Fishel Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Fishel Land Co., 3 Pa. D. & C.3d 231, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 39 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976).

Opinion

BOYLE, J.,

The question involved in the petition for allowance of counsel fees in the sum of $9,500, and counsel’s expenses in the sum of $361.81, is whether counsel for the trustee is entitled to be paid out of the trust estate for extensive professional services rendered by counsel in defending the trustee against the numerous objections filed to the trustee’s account which covered a period of 24 years, where the objections were limited to the credits in the account for compensation to the trustee for its various categories of service which were necessary to the administration of the trust and the preservation of the trust property for the benefit of approximately 200 beneficiaries.

Counsel for the objector admits the fairness of the amount of the requested compensation but asserts that counsel’s fees and expenses should be paid out of the trustee’s individual pocket and not out of the trust estate.

The court does not accept the contention of the objector that the objections to the trustee’s account did not involve items of possible surcharge against the trustee. The services of the trustee were directly related to the preservation, protection, administration and distribution of the trust property. The court does not perceive any distinction between this case and similar cases where a surcharge is sought because of a dereliction of [233]*233duty on the part of a fiduciary. See Browarsky Est., 437 Pa. 282, 285, 263, A.2d 365 (1970); Coulter Est., 379 Pa. 209, 220, 108 A.2d 681 (1954).

Counsel’s fees and expenses should be paid out of the trust estate.

A decree will be entered in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Browarsky Estate
263 A.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Coulter Estate
108 A.2d 681 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Pa. D. & C.3d 231, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fishel-land-co-pactcomplallegh-1976.