In re Fischer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fischer

159 A.3d 431, 228 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 1753444, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 432

DecidedMay 4, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.3d 431 (In re Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fischer, 159 A.3d 431, 228 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 1753444, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 432 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-062, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14(a)(E), DENISE TAMARA FISCHER, A/K/A DENISE TAMARA HERMAN, of REDING-TON SHORES, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this [628]*628State in 1987, and whose license was administratively revoked pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c) because of her administrative ineligibility for seven consecutive years, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Florida for conduct that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.1(b)(failure to respond to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENISE TAMARA FISCHER, A/K/A DENISE TAMARA HERMAN, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-062, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14(a)(E), DENISE TAMARA FISCHER, A/K/A DENISE TAMARA HERMAN, of REDING-TON SHORES, FLORIDA, who was admitted to the bar of this [628]*628State in 1987, and whose license was administratively revoked pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c) because of her administrative ineligibility for seven consecutive years, should be reprimanded based on discipline imposed in the state of Florida for conduct that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.1(b)(failure to respond to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENISE TAMARA FISCHER, A/K/A DENISE TAMARA HERMAN, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.3d 431, 228 N.J. 627, 2017 WL 1753444, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fischer-nj-2017.