In Re Fisch
This text of In Re Fisch (In Re Fisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE HARRY FISCH
______________________
2011-1068 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 90/008,024. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN F. MURPHY.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor Associate, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Fisch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fisch-cafc-2011.