in Re: First National Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2007
Docket13-06-00670-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: First National Bank (in Re: First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: First National Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-00670-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG



IN RE FIRST NATIONAL BANK

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Request for Temporary Relief



Memorandum Opinion



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

Relator, First National Bank, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief in the above cause. On December 7, 2006, we issued an order staying all proceeding before the trial court and requested a response from the real party in interest, Lillian Ruth Soto. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. This Court's order staying the trial court's proceedings is LIFTED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed on

this the 6th day of March, 2007.

1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: First National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-first-national-bank-texapp-2007.