In Re First Hartford Corp.

23 B.R. 729, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 662, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3100, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1045
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 20, 1982·No. 19-01072·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

DECISION ON MOTION TO DEFER INTERIM COMPENSATION TO A.E. GETZLER & CO. AND TO BALLON, STOLL & ITZLER, ESQS.

EDWARD J. RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On February 20, 1981, First Hartford Corporation, doing business as Wyandotte Mills (“First Hartford”), filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. (the “Code”). Pursuant to section 1108 of the Code, First Hartford continued to operate its business and manage its property as a debtor in possession. 1

Pursuant to an order of this court dated February 25, 1981, First Hartford was authorized to engage and retain the law firm of Ballon, Stoll & Itzler, Esqs., as counsel under a general retainer to represent it in its Chapter 11 case.

Shortly thereafter, on March 16,1981, the court authorized First Hartford to factor its accounts receivable with James Talcott Factors, Inc. (the “Factor”). The Factor agreed to purchase the accounts receivable of First Hartford and to make advances thereon in return for obtaining a security interest in those accounts. The Factor was relegated to a subordinate secured position with respect to the Maine Guaranty Authority (“MGA”), the largest creditor of First Hartford holding claims against it in the approximate sum of $4,000,000. Any proceeds in excess of the position of MGA were subject to the lien of the Factor. The March 16, 1981 order also provided the Factor with a “super priority” administration claim pursuant to section 364(c) of the Code. 2

An order dated May 11, 1981, authorized the Committee of Unsecured Creditors of First Hartford (“the Committee”) to retain A.E. Getzler & Co., Inc. (“Getzler”) to perform certain management consultation services. 3 The order fixed Getzler’s maximum compensation at a sum not to exceed $25,000 plus out-of-pocket disbursements. 4 *731 It further granted Getzler leave to apply for interim compensation pursuant to section 331 of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 331 explicitly authorizes the bankruptcy court to grant interim compensation and provides, in pertinent part:

... [A]ny professional person employed under section 327 ... of this title may apply to the court ... for [interim] compensation for services rendered before the date of such an application or reimbursement for expenses incurred before such date as is provided under section 330 of this title .... [T]he court may allow and disburse to such applicant such compensation or reimbursement.

On August 31, 1981, Getzler filed an application for interim compensation pursuant to section 331 of the Code. Getzler sought the sum of $22,800 for professional management consultation services rendered, plus the sum of $1,707.28 for expenses. Supporting court records verify that the total interim allowance requested was the sum of $24,507.28.

An application of the Committee indicating its approval of the total interim allowance to Getzler was submitted to this court on October 21, 1981. At a hearing held pursuant to section 331 of the Code on November 30, 1981, First Hartford voiced objections to this application, arguing that the amount of compensation Getzler sought was excessive and totally out of line with reality.

In an objection filed with this court on the same day, First Hartford also maintained that the interim fees to Getzler should not be paid until all of the administrative claims 5 were paid in full, and, that First Hartford’s current assets were insufficient to pay all the administrative claims.

On December 16, 1981, despite the objections of First Hartford, 6 this court signed an order (the “Order”) awarding an allowance of interim compensation to Getzler in the amount of $22,800 for services plus an additional $1,707.28 for disbursements. Notices of motion requesting deferral of the interim compensation award were filed with this court by First Hartford and MGA on December 29, 1981, and December 30, 1981, respectively.

First Hartford sought a deferral of the interim compensation grant to Getzler until it was clear that it would realize sufficient monies from the liquidation of its assets 7 to pay in full all administrative claims pursuant to the provisions of section 503 of the Code. First Hartford maintained that at that time it did not have sufficient funds to make the payments to Getzler, which the December 16,1981, order required. In fact, First Hartford indicated that it only had a current cash balance of $5,000 which was barely sufficient to meet operating expenses for the next two weeks.

The court recognizes that a debtor attempting to reorganize in this situation would be hard pressed to meet the payment of administration expenses while maintaining cash flow requirements for business.

The MGA motion on December 30, 1981, requested that the interim compensation awarded to Getzler be deferred until confirmation of First Hartford’s Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. MGA claimed that the security interests of other secured creditors, including itself, would be seriously prejudiced if the award to Getzler were not deferred. MGA further maintained that as *732 a result of its present dispute 8 with First Hartford, it may have an administrative claim against the debtor and, thus, be directly prejudiced by any preconfirmation payment to Getzler.

The objection expressed by both First Hartford and MGA that a payment of interim compensation to Getzler would prejudice existing administrative and “super priority” claims is the primary issue in this case. Although courts have held that prejudice to a secured creditor is insufficient to preclude an award of interim compensation, 9 if the prejudice alleged involves administrative or other first priority claims under section 507(a)(1) of the Code, an award of interim compensation may be deferred.

Recently, it has been held that where there are insufficient funds in the debtor’s estate to pay interim allowances, these allowances may be deferred until a time when unencumbered funds become available for payment. Matter of Codesco, Inc., 15 B.R. 354, 8 BCD 482; 5 CBC 2d 738 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re First Hartford Corp., 23 B.R. 729, 7 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 662, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3100, 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1045 (N.Y. 1982).

23 B.R. 729 (In Re First Hartford Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Child World, Inc.
185 B.R. 14 (S.D. New York, 1995)
In Re Microwave Products of America, Inc.
102 B.R. 661 (W.D. Tennessee, 1989)
In Re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire
93 B.R. 823 (D. New Hampshire, 1988)
In Re Nana Daly's Pub, Ltd.
67 B.R. 782 (E.D. New York, 1986)
In Re IML Freight, Inc.
52 B.R. 124 (D. Utah, 1985)
In Re Four Star Terminals, Inc.
42 B.R. 419 (D. Alaska, 1984)