In re Fiorani

134 S. Ct. 1954, 188 L. Ed. 2d 977, 572 U.S. 1086, 82 U.S.L.W. 3631, 2014 WL 1255207, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3071
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13–9410.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from the petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *1955Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fiorani, 134 S. Ct. 1954, 188 L. Ed. 2d 977, 572 U.S. 1086, 82 U.S.L.W. 3631, 2014 WL 1255207, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3071 (U.S. 2014).

134 S. Ct. 1954 (In re Fiorani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)