In re Finnican

413 S.E.2d 800, 330 N.C. 612
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 9, 1992·No. No. 519P91·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion by guardian ad litem (Gillespie) and petitioner appellee to dismiss appeal by intervenor for lack of a substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1992. Petition by intervenor for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 January 1992. Notice of appeal by petitioner appellant dismissed 9 January 1992. Petition by petitioner appellant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 9 January 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Finnican, 413 S.E.2d 800, 330 N.C. 612 (N.C. 1992).

413 S.E.2d 800 (In re Finnican) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re J.W.J.
599 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
In re Dixon
112 N.C. App. 248 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Matter of Baby Boy Dixon
435 S.E.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Nye, Mitchell, Jarvis & Bugg v. Oates
426 S.E.2d 291 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)