In re Finnican
This text of 413 S.E.2d 800 (In re Finnican) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by guardian ad litem (Gillespie) and petitioner appellee to dismiss appeal by intervenor for lack of a substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1992. Petition by intervenor for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 January 1992. Notice of appeal by petitioner appellant dismissed 9 January 1992. Petition by petitioner appellant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 9 January 1992.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 S.E.2d 800, 330 N.C. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-finnican-nc-1992.